Judgments

Division 2 - General federal law

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – protection visa – decision of the Administrative Review Tribunal – failure to appear before the Tribunal – where Tribunal dismissed the application pursuant to s 99 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (Cth) – whether the applicant was afforded sufficient time to prepare materials – whether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicant’s grounds – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Judicial review – Administrative Appeals Tribunal (as it then was) – whether the Tribunal erred in finding that there was a ground of cancellation under s 116(1AA) – whether the Tribunal failed to give proper, genuine and realistic consideration to the risk of harm to the applicants if returned to home country – whether the Tribunal failed to consider the best interests of the applicants’ Australian citizen children and the harm they would face if returned to Sri Lanka – Court finds no jurisdictional error made by the Tribunal – Application dismissed 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – application for extension of time to seek judicial review – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision to refuse applicant a protection visa – where Tribunal decision the subject of an earlier judicial review application – where applicant failed to disclose the existence of the earlier judicial review application as required pursuant to s 486D(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where compliance with s 486D(1) is a jurisdictional pre-condition – where application for an extension of time is incompetent – application dismissed with costs. 

Judgment published date:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – practice and procedure – objection to producing documents called by subpoena on the ground the documents are subject to without prejudice privilege – whether the without prejudice privilege asserted in relation to the documents is a privilege jointly held by the party seeking production and the party resisting production and for that reason must be produced – whether there would be any utility in determining whether the documents are subject to without prejudice privilege, assuming such privilege is jointly held – whether a legitimate forensic purpose has been demonstrated for the production of the documents – objection to production dismissed.

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review – decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal refusing to grant student visa – applicant provided bank statement to prove financial support – Tribunal found bank statement was bogus document – Tribunal reasonably suspected document was counterfeit or altered by person who did not have authority to do so – whether Tribunal erred in finding document was bogus document – whether Tribunal considered whether bank statement was purposely untrue – no error by Tribunal – application dismissed.

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Ex Tempore – application for the review of a Registrar's decision – judicial review – Temporary Graduate (subclass 485) visa – applicant dependent on partner whose visa had ceased – no real or genuine dispute that resolvable in an applicant’s favour – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Application in a proceeding seeking reinstatement of judicial review application – Inadequate explanation for non-attendance at final hearing – Proposed grounds of review not reasonably arguable – Application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review – decision of Immigration Assessment Authority refusing to grant protection visa – applicant provided new information to Authority – Authority not satisfied there were exceptional circumstances to justify considering new information – whether Authority assessed new information against s 473DD(b)(ii) and considered whether information was credible personal information.

MIGRATION – judicial review – applicant included hyperlink to country information report in submission to Authority – whether applicant thereby provided entirety of report to Authority – distinction between publication date of country information report which post-dated Minister’s decision and date of country information in report which pre-dated Minister’s decision.

MIGRATION – judicial review – Authority concerned about delay between date applicant claimed to have committed serious offence of which Iranian authorities were aware and date authorities sought to arrest applicant – whether Authority’s concern based on unwarranted assumption or lacked an evident and intelligible justification. 

Judgment published date:

BANKRUPTCY – Application to set aside Bankruptcy Notice (“Notice”) – Where final property orders were made pursuant to s 79 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“Family Law Act”) – Where the subject debt is the result of enforcement proceedings in the family law division of this court – Where it is alleged that the Notice had the incorrect name on it – Allegations that the Notice overstates the debt –Allegations of an abuse of process – Appropriation of funds – Where the debt is found to be overstated – Notice set aside.

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Interest on judgment debts – Where there is no prohibition on compounding interest (“interest on interest”) in the context of s 117B of the Family Law Act. 

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Suppression orders – Where it is in the interests of justice to issue a pseudonym – Where the interests of children are involved – Extant family law proceedings. 

Judgment published date:

BANKRPTCY – application to review Registrar’s Decision creditor’s petition – s 40(1)(c) and s 306 of the Bankruptcy Act - Harman undertaking – application dismissed.   

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Protection (Subclass 866) visa – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – failure to appear pursuant to s 426A – dismissed pursuant to s 425A – appeal for lack of notice to authorised recipient – proper form to elect someone as an authorised recipient pursuant to s 441G – application dismissed with costs. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority took into account the possibility that events claimed by the applicant occurred - whether the Authority had a separate duty to investigate the screenshots of a social media post. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – protection Visa – review of a Registrar’s decision – extension of time – whether the Tribunal denied the applicant procedural fairness – whether the Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error – no jurisdictional error is made out – impermissible merits review – application dismissed.

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Judicial Review – partner visa – public interest criterion 4020 (PIC 4020) – PIC 4020 waiver – whether Tribunal failed to actively and intellectually engage with representations and evidence relating to the existence of compassionate or compelling circumstances – whether Tribunal mischaracterised evidence – whether Tribunal decision was legally unreasonable – no jurisdictional error disclosed – application dismissed.

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION - Student (Temporary) (class TU) Student (subclass 500) visa– refusal for failure to satisfy Tribunal applicant was enrolled full-time in a registered course of study– no real or genuine dispute that resolvable in an applicant’s favour– application for review of Registrar’s summary dismissal– no reasonably arguable error–  application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) (Subclass 500) visa – Administrative Review Tribunal not satisfied that applicant met cl 500.212(a) of the Regulations – whether decision was partly erroneous – legally unreasonable finding made by Tribunal – found error to be material – jurisdictional error established – application allowed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the Tribunal failed to consider “the full integers of the Applicant’s claim” – limitations of the Court’s role in judicial review proceedings – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION- judicial review – decision of Administrative Review Tribunal refusing to grant student visa – whether Tribunal gave proper “weightage” - whether applicant satisfied genuine temporary entrant criterion pursuant to cl 500.212 – whether Tribunal failed to properly apply Direction 69 – whether Tribunal failed to accord procedural fairness - no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review – decision of Immigration Assessment Authority refusing to grant protection visa -  Authority rejected claims which delegate accepted – whether failure of Authority to exercise power in s 473DC to invite applicant to give new information before rejecting claims accepted by delegate was legally unreasonable – whether Authority erred in finding that it could not consider new information pursuant to s 473DD - application dismissed 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) (Subclass 820) visa – review of a decision of the Administrative Review Tribunal – procedural fairness – whether there was a failure to properly consider the applicant’s claims – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Whether Immigration Assessment Authority erred by failing to accept certain claims – whether that failure was irrational or illogical – whether dissatisfaction that applicant faces a real chance of harm for reasons associated with his mental state constitutes error. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Safe Haven Enterprise visa – decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority – treatment of new information – whether IAA should have considered document alleging translation errors – whether IAA misconstrued s 473DD – whether IAA’s findings on credibility were unreasonable or illogical – whether IAA made same error as previously constituted IAA – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review application – decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal refusing to grant protection visa – whether Tribunal the Tribunal failed to consider a claim – whether Tribunal failed to consider the applicant’s claim that he was misled and wrongly advised by his migration agent – whether there was fraud by a third party or migration agent - no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.   

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review – decision of Administrative Review Tribunal refusing to grant protection visa – whether Tribunal erred by deciding the review on the basis the applicant was not entitled to a ‘Complementary Protection Visa’ - whether Tribunal erred by failing to comply with s 359A of the Act - no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.    

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the Tribunal failed to consider evidence or claims advanced by the applicant – whether the Tribunal made a jurisdictional error by failing to make inquiries – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed.   

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – protection visa – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the Tribunal correctly applied the provisions of the Migration Act – whether the Tribunal drew an unreasonable inference – whether the Tribunal considered a claim – unreasonableness – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the Tribunal failed to consider evidence or claims advanced by the applicant – whether the Tribunal denied the applicant procedural fairness by failing to receive additional evidence or due to delay in hearing the application – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed.  

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review – decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal refusing to grant student visa – where Tribunal found applicant’s medical certificate did not contain adequate explanation as to why the applicant could not attend a telephone hearing – whether Tribunal’s finding was not logical or rational - jurisdictional error established – application allowed.

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Protection (Class XA) (subclass 866) visa – judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – exercise of discretion to dismiss for non-appearance – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review application – decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal refusing to grant a protection visa – unparticularised grounds of judicial review are liable to be dismissed – Tribunal did not err in carrying out its statutory duty - no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.  

Judgment published date:

BANKRUPTCY – application to review a registrar’s decision – where registrar dismissed application to set aside bankruptcy notice – not satisfied applicant has a cross-claim under 40(1)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act – review application dismissed.

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review application -  decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal refusing to grant Employer Nomination (subclass 186) visas – where sponsor’s visa nomination application refused – whether Tribunal made an error when considering “Benchmark A” to determine if Nominator complied with training contribution obligations – whether Tribunal erred in its approach to the definition of “payroll” – whether there was a denial of procedural fairness - application dismissed.

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review application – decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal refusing to grant a medical treatment visa – consideration of migration history falls within s 602.215(c) – lack of treatment for medical conditions - no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION - application for reinstatement – protection visa application - not satisfied the applicant has a reasonably arguable case - not satisfied there will be any utility in reinstating the proceedings – no arguable jurisdictional error - application for reinstatement dismissed.  

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – extension of time application – decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – protection visa – whether the explanation for the delay is satisfactory – whether the Tribunal should have found the notification of the delegate’s decision invalid – underlying application for review lacks merit – extension of time refused.   

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – application for review of a registrar’s decision – employer nomination visa – application for judicial review summarily dismissed by a judicial registrar – application for review of a registrar’s decision filed out of time – underlying application lacks merit – extension of time refused. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – employer nomination visa – whether the Tribunal gave clear particulars of a relevant issue – whether the Tribunal should have addressed the second applicant’s circumstances – errors made not jurisdictional in nature – Tribunal unable to reach any other outcome – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – review under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – dismissal of applicant’s protection visa application on the basis that the original claim was economically motivated – claim of persecution on the basis of bisexuality/LGBTQI plus identity – no real chance of harm in all parts of Malaysia.  

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Bridging E (Class WE) visa – whether the Tribunal breached s 360 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – no jurisdictional error disclosed – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) (subclass 500) visa – judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – unreasonableness – illogicality and irrationality – failure to consider – procedural fairness – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.  

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – where application for judicial review of a decision of the then Administrative Appeals Tribunal was filed outside of the statutory timeframe – where applicant did not offer reasonable or acceptable explanation for the delay, no particular prejudice, public interest favours finality and substantive application not reasonably arguable and lacking in merit – held that further time for making the application not be allowed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Whether Immigration Assessment Authority erred by failing to have regard to additional information – whether factual findings made without evidence – challenges to factual findings. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION- protection visa – application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Review Tribunal –  whether Tribunal complied with procedural fairness obligations in s 55 of the ART Act – whether Tribunal complied with s 106(3) of the ART Act in making a decision without a hearing where the applicant requested –  what is meant by issues for determination - whether issues could be adequately determined - whether decision legally unreasonable – where new dispositive issues raised - whether failure to consider evidence – whether failure to consider integers –  application dismissed.

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION - Application for judicial review – Student (Subclass 500) visa – Non-appearance by applicant - Application dismissed pursuant to rr 5.08(c), 5.10(a), 22.04(1)(a)(i) of the Rules. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review – Protection (Class XA) (subclass 866) visa – whether the Tribunal lawfully exercised its powers under s 106(1) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (Cth) to make its decision on the documents without holding a hearing where it determined the matter on a different dispositive issue to that of the delegate – what is required for a valid request for the purposes of s 106(3)(b)(ii) – meaning of the phrase “it appears to the Tribunal that the issues for determination in the proceeding can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties to the proceeding” – whether or not the preconditions in s 106(3) are met is a question of jurisdictional fact which is subject to judicial review by the courts – no jurisdictional error disclosed – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Judicial Review – student visa – genuine temporary entrant – broad allegations of procedural unfairness – invitation to impermissibly engage in merits review of delegate’s decision – application dismissed.

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – application for Protection (Class XA) (Subclass 866) visa –applicant in immigration detention – extension of time application – extension of time granted –– whether Administrative Review Tribunal erred by applying unreasonable reasoning – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal - student visa – applicant not having a certificate of enrolment – Tribunal refusing application for adjournment – applicant having had ample time to obtain a certificate of enrolment. 

Judgment published date:

HUMAN RIGHTS - Disability discrimination – whether in terminating an employee’s employment the employer unlawfully discriminated against employee because of a disability the employer imputed to the employee – whether in terminating the employee’s employment to whom the employer imputed a disability the employer failed to make reasonable adjustments for the employee – unlawful discrimination not established. 

Judgment published date:

MIGRATION – judicial review – decision of Immigration Assessment Authority refusing to grant protection visa –whether Authority erred in declining to exercise power under s 473DC to invite applicant to give new information at interview – whether error of fact by Authority involved jurisdictional error – application dismissed.