Please select a judgment type from the filter below to view relevant judgments. On the AustLii website you can access previous judgments types FCoA (Appeals) judgments, FCoA First instance judgments, and FCC judgments.
Division 2 - General federal law
MIGRATION – Application for judicial review of decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – student visa – whether the Tribunal erred in affording procedural fairness – whether the Tribunal’s decision was unreasonable – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.
INDUSTRIAL LAW – application for an extension of time to bring a claim under s 370 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – multiple requests for adjournment – no appearance by or on behalf of the applicant – oral application to dismiss pursuant to r 13.06(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) – application dismissed
MIGRATION – costs – indemnity costs – costs sought above scale – Calderbank offer by applicants – costs awarded to the applicants above scale amount
BANKRUPTCY – Registrar’s sequestration order – Application for review.
CONSUMER LAW – Chattel mortgage of motor vehicle (“Vehicle”) – security interest registered under the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) – application for orders sanctioning seizure of Vehicle.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – form of declaration to make to give effect to a finding of trade mark infringement – costs – whether indemnity costs should be ordered against the successful applicant after the dates by which offers to settle the proceeding were available to be accepted had passed – indemnity costs not ordered because the relief the applicant obtained was not less favourable than the terms of the offers and it was otherwise not unreasonable for the applicant to refuse to accept the offers – whether the respondents should be ordered to pay the applicant’s costs on an indemnity basis – respondents not to pay costs on an indemnity basis – whether lump sum costs order should be made – lump sum costs order made.
MIGRATION – student (class TU) (subclass 500) visa – where delegate refused to grant the applicant a visa – review of decision of the (then) Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) – where Tribunal affirmed the delegate’s refusal – where applicant failed to satisfy cl 500.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – applicant not enrolled in a registered course of study – whether applicant denied procedural fairness – Tribunal’s decision not attended by jurisdictional error – application for judicial review dismissed
DEFAMATON – JURISDICTION – Whether the Court has jurisdiction as to the Applicant’s defamation claim –Where Applicant has regularly invoked the court’s jurisdiction as to a claim under the Trade Marks Act 1995 –Held defamation claim a severable claim from the Trade Marks Act claim and not part of a single justiciable controversy – Held no jurisdiction as to the defamation claim. DEFAMATION – EXTENSION OF TIME – Held court would not in any event extend time for the commencement of the defamation action. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ABUSE OF PROCESS – Whether the Trade Marks Act application is an abuse of process because the application seeks to vex twice the First Respondent as to allegations of infringements of registered trade marks when another court has dismissed the allegations as part of the dismissal of a defence to a defamation action between the same parties in the Victorian courts – Held not an abuse of process for the Applicant to pursue claims as to infringements of trade marks raising different factual allegations. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – SECURITY FOR COSTS – Whether the court ought to order security for costs in favour of the Fifth Respondent – Applicant impecunious and has a weak case against the Fifth Respondent – Order for security
MIGRATION – judicial review – decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal refusing to grant protection visa – applicant absent from Court hearing – dismissal for non-appearance
MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Protection (Class XA) Visa – whether the Tribunal failed to perform the statutory task imposed on the Tribunal under s 414 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal denied the applicants procedural fairness by not putting the applicants on notice that the Tribunal may form the view the first applicant had “tailored” his evidence – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed
MIGRATION – Bridging Visa E – costs of challenging condition 8510 attached to visa – Minister conceding it was invalidly imposed – whether indemnity costs appropriate – quantum of costs reasonably incurred.
MIGRATION – Where non-disclosure certificate issued the existence of which was not initially disclosed to applicant which failure was found on judicial review to be in error – on remittal to Tribunal second non-disclosure certificate issued and then revoked – first non-disclosure certificate remained extant – whether applicant denied procedural fairness – whether Tribunal under obligation to proactively provide documents the subject of revoked non-disclosure certificate
MIGRATION – Application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – refusal to grant the applicant a Medical Treatment (Visitor) (Class UB) visa – whether the Tribunal’s decision was legally unreasonable – whether the Tribunal incorrectly dealt with the evidence – whether the applicant was denied procedural fairness – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed
MIGRATION - Application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – refusal to grant the applicant a Visitor (Class FA) (subclass 600) visa – Tribunal found the applicant in providing spiritual healing was working in breach of a previous visa condition 8101 – meaning of “work” in reg 1.03 as activity that normally attracts remuneration - whether the activity performed by the applicant was such that normally attracts remuneration – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – permitted a friend of the applicant to make submissions on her behalf in recognition of the extension of the concept of a Mckenzie friend
MIGRATION – Application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal - refusal to grant a Partner (Residence) (Class BS) visa – family violence exception – whether the Tribunal in order to accord procedural fairness was required to raise with the first applicant the deficiencies in the evidence put forward as to a non-judicially determined claim of family violence – whether the Tribunal failed to comply with s 360 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the issue was apparent from its nature or from the terms of the legislation under which it was made – no jurisdiction error – application dismissed.
INDUSTRIAL LAW – Where applicant alleged adverse action taken for a prohibited reason – where adverse action conceded – whether first respondent was involved in a contravention of the Fair Work Act – whether the second respondent was knowingly concerned in or a party to a contravention of the Fair Work Act – where the claim against the first respondent had been established – where the claim against the second respondent had not been established – orders accordingly.
MIGRATION – student (class TU) (subclass 500) visa- review of decision of the (then) Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) – judicial review – genuine temporary entrant criterion – where Tribunal purported to apply Direction No. 69 made under s 499 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Act) – whether Tribunal failed to engage with relevant considerations under that Direction – whether Tribunal failed to comply with s 499(2A) of the Act – Tribunal’s decision attended by jurisdictional error – writ of certiorari issued – writ of mandamus issued
INDUSTRIAL LAW – COSTS – Small claims proceeding in Fair Work Division – whether misunderstanding of party that proceedings were listed for final hearing instead of further directions was an unreasonable act for purposes of s 570 of the Fair Work Act – whether existence of legal advisors not on record, and without leave to represent party, can give rise to a party incurring costs for purposes of s 570 of the Fair Work Act especially in small claims proceeding INDUSTRIAL LAW – Review of Registrar’s decision awarding costs to unrepresented litigant in small claims proceeding where leave neither sought nor granted for legal representation
MIGRATION – Application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) - protection visa – applicant unrepresented - whether the Tribunal misconstrued the definition of significant harm – whether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicant’s claims against the “Convention definition” – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.
INDUSTRIAL LAW – Commonwealth public service employment – Defence – Navy – contracting – various contraventions alleged - request for flexible working arrangement – unauthorised absences from work – refusal of request to take paid annual leave – failure to pay notice or payment in lieu of notice of three weeks pay – failure to pay base rate of pay – various adverse actions alleged – coercion and undue pressure in relation to request for flexible working arrangements – coercion in relation to written notice of annual leave – coercion in relation to taking of annual leave – termination of employment – refusal to allow work from home – denial of request to start work later – manner of supervision – allocation of less meaningful tasks – exclusion from training activities – issuance of various instruction letters – referral of conduct to Directorate of Conduct and Performance – performance assessment outcome PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for an extension of time to file an affidavit – extension of time – factors for consideration – where short extension of time not objected to – whether sufficient explanation for delay – no prejudice in short extension of time – whether affidavit assists with merit of application PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for witness to give evidence by video link – delay in making application – whether disruption to duties of witness – where witness a carer for family member – whether evidence of need for and extent of care – case management considerations – length and complexity of evidence of witness – where lengthy cross-examination likely – costs of giving evidence in person PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for access to audio recordings of first three days of substantive hearing
MIGRATION – student visa – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – irrationality – whether the Tribunal misunderstood cl 500.212 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicant’s circumstances and genuine intention to stay in Australia temporarily – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.
MIGRATION – protection visa – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicant’s claims – whether the Tribunal failed to consider the complementary protection criteria – where the applicant elected not to attend a Tribunal hearing – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.
MIGRATION – protection visa – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the Tribunal provided the applicant with a fair opportunity to present her claims – procedural fairness – whether the Tribunal correctly applied s 36(2)(aa) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.
MIGRATION - Whether the Tribunal failed to adequately engage with cl 500.212 of Schedule 2 of the Regulations – whether the Tribunal took into account irrelevant considerations
MIGRATION – judicial review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal’s decision refusing to grant the first applicant a Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa on the basis that she did not meet cl 187.233(3) of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – applicant was not the subject of an approved nomination – review of registrar’s decision ordering summary dismissal on the basis that the claim for relief had no reasonable prospect of success – application for review dismissed.
MIGRATION – judicial review – decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal refusing to grant medical treatment visa – whether denial of procedural fairness – no jurisdictional error - whether grant of relief futile - application dismissed
MIGRATION – Safe Haven Enterprise (subclass 790) visa – Immigration Assessment Authority – whether the Authority failed to afford the applicant procedural fairness – whether the Authority ignored relevant information – whether the Authority misconstrued and misunderstood the applicant’s claims – whether the Authority relied upon incorrect country information – grounds of review invite the Court to undertake impermissible merits review – Application dismissed.
MIGRATION – judicial review – where Administrative Review Tribunal affirmed delegate’s decision to refuse protection visas – where applicants claimed to fear persecution from loan sharks – where Tribunal not satisfied with applicants’ evidence of circumstances of loan or threats from loan sharks – Tribunal did not adopt legally unreasonable process of reasoning regarding alleged threats from loan sharks or availability of effective state protection measures – application dismissed
MIGRATION – Temporary Graduate (Class VC) (Subclass 485) visa – applicant did not comply with the mandatory requirement for the grant of the visa – grounds of review invite the Court to undertake impermissible merits review – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.
MIGRATION – application for Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa – the Tribunal on review refused to approve the employer’s nomination of the first applicant in the Direct Entry stream and accordingly refused to grant the applicants visa as there was no approved nomination – no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal’s decision not to approve the employer nomination – application dismissed
MIGRATION – application for student visa – copying of delegate’s findings by the Tribunal - whether Tribunal abrogated its statutory function - Tribunal erred by giving improper deference to decision of the delegate – Tribunal failed to bring its own mind to the determination of the correct or preferrable decision - appeal allowed – writ of certiorari issued – writ of mandamus issued
MIGRATION – Medical Treatment (Support Person) visa – contemporaneous hearing – whether the applicant met the requirements of the visa – where the grounds of judicial review do not reveal jurisdictional error – application dismissed with costs
MIGRATION – Medical Treatment (Class UB) Subclass 602 visa – whether the applicant genuinely intended to remain in Australia for the purposes of the visa – allegation of legal unreasonableness, irrationality or illogicality in the decision under review– where the grounds of judicial review do not reveal jurisdictional error – application dismissed with costs
MIGRATION – Medical Treatment (Class UB) Subclass 602 visa – whether the applicant genuinely intended to remain in Australia for the purposes of the visa – allegation of legal unreasonableness, irrationality or illogicality in the decision under review– where the grounds of judicial review do not reveal jurisdictional error – application dismissed with costs
BANKRUPTCY – Application for stay of sequestration order made by registrar pending hearing of application for review of registrar’s decision – applicable principles in considering whether to grant stay – whether arguable case – balance of convenience
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Interim non-publication order
INDUSTRIAL LAW – Fair Work – penalty hearing – failure to comply with compliance notice – respondent has failed to defend proceedings with due diligence – liability determined – underpayment of one employee – first time offender – lack of cooperation by the respondent – calculation of penalty – matters to be considered.
INDUSTRIAL LAW – Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – construction of enterprise agreements – relevant principles.
MIGRATION – Whether Immigration Assessment Authority erred in manner identified in MZZJO – whether Authority failed to properly understand claim of applicant to have converted to Christianity
MIGRATION – Non-appearance of the applicant at the final hearing – Where the applicant was properly informed of the hearing – Application dismissed for non-appearance pursuant to rule 13.06(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)
MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – refusal of a bridging visa application – whether the Tribunal failed to consider the circumstances in which the applicant was unable to meet the criteria for the visa – whether the Tribunal’s decision was affected by legal unreasonableness – whether the Tribunal’s decision was otherwise affected by relevant error – futility – application dismissed
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where the applicant failed to appear at a listing before the Court relating to his judicial review application – application dismissed pursuant to r 13.06(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where the applicant failed to appear at a listing before the Court relating to his judicial review application – application dismissed pursuant to r 13.06(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)
INDUSTRIAL LAW – FAIR WORK – application for default judgment – consideration of rr 13.04 and 13.05 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) General Federal Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) – alleged contraventions of ss 45 and 323(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – serious contraventions found – application granted.
MIGRATION – Application to set aside order dismissing judicial review application – judicial review application dismissed for non-appearance – applicant claims not aware of hearing date – email address not one used by primary applicant – email address created by person assisting with drafting of judicial review application – whether adequate reason for non-appearance – whether reasonably arguable prospects of success on proposed grounds of review – whether loan agreement in Malaysia – credibility – whether findings unreasonable or illogical – whether weight given to allegations made – whether fraud on Tribunal in relation to non-appearance.
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to set aside order dismissing judicial review application – considerations relevant to exercise of discretion to set aside dismissal order – whether adequate reasons for non-appearance – whether delay in making set aside application – whether prejudice to respondent – whether reasonably arguable prospects of success on proposed grounds of review
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Proposed further amended application for judicial review – whether orders sought – whether submissions or commentary – whether further orders sought relate to set aside of dismissal order or judicial review application – whether furthers sought are orders capable of being made.
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Statutory declaration not accepted for filing – where identical (or substantially so) statutory declaration previously rejected for filing.
MIGRATION – application for student visa – primary applicant failed to satisfy ‘genuine temporary entrant criterion’ – criteria in cl 500.211 to cl 500.218 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) required to be satisfied by at least one of the applicants – Tribunal decision not affected by jurisdictional error – application dismissed.
MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision by the Immigration Assessment Authority (“IAA”) – whether the IAA’s reasoning was relevantly open to the IAA based upon the material before it – application dismissed
MIGRATION – application for judicial review – decision of the AAT to not grant Protection (Subclass 866) Visa – whether the Tribunal was acting under dictation of a previous decision maker – whether the Tribunal had an independent mind – whether the Tribunal acted unreasonably or illogically in conducting its research – whether the Tribunal made findings based on speculation – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed
MIGRATION – judicial review – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal refusing to grant a student visa – where the decision of the Tribunal to not reinstate the application was unreasonable – confirmation decision squashed – matter remitted to the Tribunal - application for judicial review allowed
MIGRATION – application for review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal’s decision – student visa – Public Interest Criterion 4020 – jurisdictional error established.
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) (Subclass 500) visa – Summary dismissal - Application for review of Registrar’s decision – Application for an extension of time – Extension granted – Rule 21.02(2) – Review allowed - Application for judicial review reinstated.
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 18
- Next page