INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – practice and procedure – application for leave to withdraw admissions – application dismissed.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – evidence – objection to the admissibility of recording of events that occurred at gyms – whether the recordings record private conversations within the meaning of the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) – objection overruled. 

MIGRATION – child visa – decision of the then Administrative Appeals Tribunal – cl 802.214 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal asked itself the wrong question or applied the wrong test – whether the Tribunal failed to address a claim – meaning of “been undertaking a full-time course of study” – reliance upon a different decision of the Tribunal – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – Visitor (Class FA) visa – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – genuine temporary entrant criterion – whether the Tribunal failed to lawfully apply cl 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal failed to give proper weight to the applicant’s evidence – whether the Tribunal made an irrational or illogical finding – whether the Tribunal failed to consider all relevant matters or evidence – whether the Tribunal considered irrelevant matters or evidence – whether the applicant was denied a fair hearing – whether the Tribunal was biased or acted in bad faith – whether the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction – whether the Tribunal unreasonably exercised a discretionary power – whether the Tribunal’s decision is affected by jurisdictional error – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed. 

MIGRATION – Tribunal found Vietnamese protection visa applicant’s fears of persecution neither existed nor were well founded – Tribunal did respond to applicant’s arguments and did not make an error of the sort identified in Appellant S395/2002 – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision – whether Tribunal erred in finding that it had no jurisdiction – consideration of whether notification of decision to refuse the applicant’s visa satisfied the requirements of s.66(2)(d)(ii) – notification deemed to be invalid –application is allowed with costs.  

MIGRATION – Employer Nomination (Subclass 186) visa - Review of registrar’s decision to summarily dismiss application for judicial review – Review application filed 20 days out of time – First applicant not subject to approved nomination – No material jurisdictional error identified - Application for review dismissed.  

MIGRATION – Applicant applied twice to Tribunal in relation to delegate’s visa decision – Tribunal had no jurisdiction to review repeat application – application for extension in which to bring application for review – not in interests of justice to extend time – new evidence not admissible.

MIGRATION – JUDICIAL REVIEW – Where the Applicant sought review of a Registrar’s decision to give summary judgment – Where the Applicant sought an adjournment of the review hearing – Where the Applicant did not establish why or how he was unable to attend the hearing – Adjournment refused – Review application dismissed on the Applicant’s non-appearance. 

MIGRATION – protection visa – judicial review of decision of Immigration Assessment Authority to refuse visa – where the applicant claims involvement in political activity such that he is person of interest to authorities – where Authority found applicant’s political involvement low-level – whether Authority failed to exercise discretion to consider new information – whether Authority properly engaged with the applicant’s claims – no jurisdictional error established.

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – protection visa – decision related to BBX21 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FedCFamC2G 2124 – where errors in interpretation at the Tribunal’s hearing led to an unreasonable decision – jurisdictional error established.    

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – protection visa – where there were multiple errors in interpretation at the Tribunal’s hearing – where the misinterpretations cannot be linked to particular findings – misinterpretations caused the hearing to be procedurally unfair – misinterpretations led to unreasonable findings – jurisdictional error established. 

MIGRATION – application for an extension of time – decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – protection visa – where the Tribunal decided it did not have jurisdiction – where the appeal to the Tribunal was filed out of time – where the applicant faced mental and financial distress – underlying application for judicial review has no prospect of succeeding – extension of time refused.

MIGRATION – Tribunal hearing during COVID by telephone – applicant does not appear – applicant notified by email nominating telephone number applicant had provided to Department – on particular facts of case not unreasonable – decision in DNK17 v Minister does not dictate result. 

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority (“IAA”) – where the IAA found that it was precluded from considering new information by s 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where the IAA’s reasoning demonstrates some misunderstanding or confusion regarding what had been claimed in the new information – whether the IAA relevantly erred in its application of s 473DD – whether the IAA failed to consider a claim regarding the applicant’s mental health – writs issued.

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision
not to grant Protection (subclass 866) visa – whether Tribunal failed to consider evidence – whether Tribunal made illogical or irrational findings about the evidence of witnesses – whether Tribunal made credibility findings unsupported by evidence – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – Apprehension of bias due to prejudgment must be firmly established – Tribunal did not prejudge by taking into account the incorrect answers in a visa application in coming to a credibility finding – application dismissed. 

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision
not to grant Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa – whether Tribunal failed to afford Applicant procedural fairness – whether Tribunal’s decision was predetermined – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.

MIGRATION - Student (Class TU) (Subclass 500) visa – Application for judicial review – Whether Tribunal considered all evidence and claims – Denial of natural justice - No jurisdictional error – Application dismissed. 

MIGRATION – Judicial Review – protection visa – credibility assessment – whether Tribunal failed to assess the second applicant’s evidence properly and independently of the first applicant’s evidence – whether Tribunal’s finding that the second applicant’s evidence was false was illogical – whether Tribunal failed to consider whether the second applicant met complementary protection criterion in s 36(2)(aa) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – alleged failure to afford procedural fairness – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.

 MIGRATION – application for judicial review – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision not to grant a Student (Temporary) (class TU) Higher Education Sector (subclass 573) visa – whether the Tribunal findings were unreasonable – whether the Tribunal failed to considered relevant evidence– disagreement with the Tribunal’s fact-finding – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed. 

INDUSTRIAL LAW – Costs – application for costs under s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – whether the Applicant institute the proceeding vexatiously or without reasonable cause – was there an unreasonable act or omission no discretion engaged – no costs ordered - application dismissed. 

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for substituted service – whether it is impracticable to serve documents by hand – whether the proposed methods of service will result in the documents coming to the attention of the second respondent – orders for substituted service made.

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – fair work –  interlocutory application to withdraw admissions – where respondent made admissions in defence and filed amended defence withdrawing admissions – where applicant did not consent to withdrawal – arguable case that admissions were incorrect - limited prejudice to applicant to meet claims in amended defence – leave granted to withdraw admissions – interlocutory application to strike out those parts of defence withdrawing earlier admissions – application dismissed. 

FAIR WORK – assessment of pecuniary penalties following respondents’ admission of liability – declaration of contravention of civil remedy provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) made previously – orders made.

FAIR WORK – general protection –  adverse action – workplace right relating to complaint about employment -adverse action – applicant’s employment terminated for cause following inquiry – substantive and operative reason for adverse action – interlocutory application for interim reinstatement – serious issue to be tried – balance of convenience – allegations of misconduct from both parties – where the Applicant asserts she gets along well with staff – where the Respondents assert irreparable damage and mistrust between the parties – matters to be considered. 

INDUSTRIAL LAW – INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION – applicant seeking orders on default of first respondent – first respondent failed to defend proceedings with due diligence – appropriate to make orders sought.

INDUSTRIAL LAW – FAIR WORK – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.11(c) of the Federal Circuit Court and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2025 (Cth) – applicant seeking declarations of contraventions of the first respondent of ss 44, 45, 323, 340 and 536 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – contraventions of civil remedy provisions – second and third respondents alleged to be involved in particular contraventions of the first respondent – default judgment entered – declarations of contraventions and orders for respondents to pay unpaid monies with interest, payment of loss of income, general damages – matter listed for penalty hearing. 

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the Tribunal’s refusal of an adjournment was legally unreasonable – futility – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the applicant was denied procedural fairness – whether the Tribunal failed to take into account relevant considerations or evidence – whether the Tribunal’s decision was otherwise affected by legally relevant error – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) (Subclass 500) visa – where Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed decision not to grant the applicants the visa – where the Tribunal found that the first applicant provided false or misleading information and therefore did not satisfy public interest criterion  4020 – whether the Tribunal denied the applicants natural justice – found that the Tribunal afforded the applicants natural justice pursuant to s 422B of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) –  where the Tribunal decision is affected by bias – found that a fair-minded and appropriately informed lay observer would not reasonably apprehend bias on the part of the Tribunal – where the applicants raised an allegation of fraud on behalf of an immigration agent – found fraud not established – application dismissed. 

MIGRATION – application for review of a Registrar’s decision – hearing de novo of first respondent’s application for summary judgment – where applicants applied for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Temporary Graduate (Post-Study Work) (subclass 485) visa – where Registrar summarily dismissed the applicants’ application for judicial review – whether Tribunal erred by conducting the hearing via telephone – found Tribunal conducted the hearing pursuant to the obligations in s 366(1)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal afforded the applicants procedural fairness – found the applicants were afforded procedural fairness – found grounds of review have no reasonable prospect of success – application dismissed. 

MIGRATION – Whether Tribunal conflated claims, failed to carry out forward-looking test and failed to engage with claims.

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the Tribunal’s decision was unreasonable or illogical – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – judicial review – decision of Administrative Review Tribunal refusing to grant protection visa – applicant absent from Court hearing – dismissal for non-appearance.

MIGRATION – Judicial review – Protection (Class XA) (Subclass 866) visa – Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to comply with s 425(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in failing to inform the first applicant of a dispositive issue in relation to country information – Whether the Tribunal failed to consider a claim or an integer of a claim being that the first applicant would be targeted by the Nepal Communist Party because of both his claim based on political opinion and his claim to be a member of a social group who was perceived as being wealthy due to his time overseas – Whether the Tribunal misused country information as to the treatment of returnees – No jurisdictional error disclosed – Application dismissed.

MIGRATION – Immigration Assessment Authority – safe haven enterprise visas – whether the Authority erred in failing to consider new information – whether the Authority erred in failing to consider claims – whether the Authority’s reasoning was irrational.   

FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Parenting Orders – Child to spend time with the Father – Supervised time progressing to unsupervised time – Impact of conflict between parenting on functional decision making in relation to the child – Mother’s overseas travel with the child permitted.

FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – Division of property – Proceeds of sale – Asset by asset or global approach – Financial and parenting contributions – Short Marriage – Future needs adjustment – Value of property – No evidence as to value in some instances.

FAMILY LAW – CHILD SUPPORT – Arrears – Application for child support departure order – Application dismissed.

FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for Review dismissed – Application to set aside costs order dismissed – Intervenors joined as parties to the proceedings.

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal that it did not have jurisdiction to review a decision refusing to grant the applicant a student visa because no valid review application was made – whether the Tribunal was correct to find that the review application was made outside of the prescribed period – where the applicant’s authorised recipient failed to advise him of the delegate’s decision before the end of the prescribed period – whether complaints about the applicant’s agent amounted to jurisdictional error – whether the Tribunal acted unreasonably – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed. 

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming a decision not to grant the applicant a protection visa – whether the Tribunal relied on incorrect information – where the Tribunal failed to ask relevant questions relating to harm – whether the Tribunal failed to afford the applicant a fair hearing due to interpreter errors – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed. 

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision made by the Administrative Review Tribunal – whether the Tribunal failed to consider an integer of the applicant’s claim – whether the Tribunal denied the applicant procedural fairness – whether the Tribunal relied on incorrect information or facts from a different case – whether the Tribunal failed to ask the applicant questions about the types of harm relevant in her case – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed. 

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where the applicant failed to appear at a listing before the Court relating to his judicial review application – application dismissed pursuant to r 22.04(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2025 (Cth). 

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where the applicant failed to appear at a listing before the Court relating to his judicial review application – application dismissed pursuant to r 22.04(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2025 (Cth). 

MIGRATION – application for review of Registrar decision refusing reinstatement – judicial review application dismissed for non-appearance – where applicant requires an extension of time to prosecute her review – judicial review application lacking in merit – review application dismissed with costs.

MIGRATION – Protection (Class XA) (Subclass 866) visa cancelled under s 109 of the Migration Act – previous remittal from this Court – where Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate’s decision under review on basis that applicant did not satisfy s 101 – application for judicial review – whether Tribunal had regard to best interests of the children as a primary consideration – found Tribunal erred in failing to engage in weighing process – jurisdictional error established – writ of mandamus issued to Tribunal requiring it to determine the application for review according to law. 

ADMIRALTY – urgent application - urgent order for defendant to have expert inspect vessel - plaintiff has been willing to identify it will permit an inspection occurring up to at least on 4 pm on 28 November 2025 – application dismissed.  

FAIR WORK – application for default judgment – where the first respondent has not complied with orders of the Court – consideration of rr 5.09, 5.11(c) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2025 (Cth) – alleged contraventions of ss 536(1) and 716(5) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – default judgment entered.

MIGRATION – judicial review – Administrative Appeals Tribunal (the Tribunal) affirmed delegate’s decision refusing to grant a protection visa – Federal Court remitted matter to the Tribunal – whether the Tribunal failed to consider an integer of the claim – whether the Tribunal failed to complete the statutory review – whether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicant’s capacity to present arguments and give evidence – no jurisdictional error disclosed – application dismissed. 

FAIR WORK – Prosecution for contraventions of the Fair Work Act – liquidation of first respondent employer –– admissions that Compliance Notice was not satisfied –underpayment of employees who suffered loss – admitted failure to provide payslips – finding by admission that second respondent involved in contraventions – imposition of civil penalties to be paid by the second respondent to the Commonwealth.

MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) (Subclass 500) visa – Review of registrar’s decision to dismiss reinstatement application – Whether any reasonable merit or any prospects of success in the application for judicial review – Whether in interest of justice to reinstate application for judicial review – Explanation for failing to appear inadequate – No reasonable prospects - Application dismissed.