MIGRATION – Judicial Review –  student visa – cancellation under s 109 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – interpretation and application of reg 2.41 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed. 

MIGRATION – application for review of a summary dismissal decision made by a Registrar – where the substantive application has no reasonable prospect of success – application dismissed

MIGRATION – Application for judicial review – decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority – citizen of Afghanistan – Hazara Shia – previously resident in Quetta, Pakistan – whether the test for internal relocation in considering whether there was taken not to be a real risk of suffering significant harm in Afghanistan was misunderstood or misapplied – whether constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction – whether comparative analysis rather than consideration of safe place for relocation engaged in – whether constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction by failing to rely upon most recent new information concerning the security situation in Afghanistan – whether decision irrational or illogical because finding of fact not open – whether error in exercise of jurisdiction by misunderstanding or misapplying the meaning of “well-founded fear of persecution” – whether material jurisdictional error.

EVIDENCE – Objection to annexures to affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant – new information – whether new information must be considered by the Authority – where evidence relevant to a ground of review – evidence admissible 

MIGRATION – Judicial review – decision of Immigration Assessment Authority – citizen of Sri Lanka – Tamil ethnicity – Christian religion – alleged fear of harm from Tamil political organisation – new information being allegation of abduction and sexual assault – whether failure to apply real chance test – whether failure to consider relevant considerations – whether failure to consider whether new information met statutory requirements – whether law misunderstood or misinterpreted in consideration of new information – whether failure to consider claim applicant specifically targeted – whether failure to consider concerning conduct of Tamil political organisation – whether failure to consider information relating to risk of torture or other serious or significant harm – whether findings unreasonable, illogical or irrational – whether findings made on basis of no probative evidence – whether  exceptional circumstances to justify considering new information – whether unreasonable not to interview applicant – whether unreasonable not to give significant corroborative weight to letters from various civil and clerical officeholders – whether material jurisdictional error – writs issued

MIGRATION – Safe Haven Enterprise visa – decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority – where the applicant was unaware of the grounds raised – whether failure to consider claims – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed

MIGRATION – Safe Haven Enterprise visa – decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority – where the applicant was unaware of the grounds raised – whether the IAA considered information provided by the secretary – whether the applicant was properly notified of the IAA’s decision – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed

MIGRATION- Immigration Assessment Authority – Safe Haven Enterprise Visa – Whether the Authority erred in its consideration of new information pursuant to s 473DD – The Authority’s reference to “credible or corroborative” information –Imposing a higher standard of satisfaction in considering s 473DD - jurisdictional error established – Application allowed.

MIGRATION – Immigration Assessment Authority – refusal of Safe Haven Enterprise Visa (SHEV) (Subclass 790) visa – whether the Authority committed jurisdictional error by failing to apply the well-founded fear test – whether the Authority failed to consider the prevalence of torture in Sri Lanka – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Partner (Provisional) (Class UF) (subclass 309) visa – whether the Tribunal understood and considered applicant’s claims when deciding to exercise its discretion under s 116 of the Act – no jurisdictional error made out – application dismissed.

BANKRUPTCY – Creditor’s petition – No matter of principle

FAIR WORK – application for costs

MIGRATION -  judicial review – decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – protection visa – whether Tribunal failed to consider claims or documents - no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – matter listed for final hearing – no appearance by or on behalf of the applicant – application dismissed pursuant to r 13.06(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) 

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs – Application for costs where the applicant was successful in the substantive proceeding – Where the criteria for costs ordered on an indemnity basis was not satisfied – Costs ordered in accordance with the Court’s scale

CONSUMER LAW – Chattel mortgage of motor vehicle (“Vehicle”) – security interest registered under the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) – application for orders sanctioning seizure of Vehicle. 

INDUSTRIAL LAW – FAIR WORK – on remittal from the Full Court of the Federal Court – lengthy procedural history – initial application filed in 2015 – Letter from company to prospective employees – Full Court found letter contained threats to take adverse action – whether the Letter was sent with an intention to prevent the exercise of workplace right – consideration of chief operating officer’s evidence both at the first trial and re-trial – witness found to be credible – finding that letter not sent for proscribed purpose – section 340 and 343 claims not made out

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – procedural issue – whether judgment can be delivered when court advised after judgment reserved the respondent was placed in administration – operation of section 440D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – liberty to apply

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – protection visa – review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where the Tribunal made adverse credibility findings – whether the Tribunal’s findings were legally unreasonable – application dismissed 

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – medical treatment visa – review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal - whether the Tribunal acted unreasonably in relation to the request for an extension of time – whether the Tribunal’s decision was affected by apprehended bias – no jurisdictional error established - application dismissed.

MIGRATION – Extension of time application – Short delay and satisfactory explanation – no prospects of success – application dismissed

MIGRATION – Whether the Tribunal conducted a proper review – whether the decision of the Tribunal was attended with any irrationality or illogicality – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – Whether the Tribunal carried out a proper review – whether the Tribunal misdirected itself as to its consideration of the relevant criteria under PIC 4020 – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – urgent interlocutory application to restrain Minister from removing applicant from Australia – whether serious question to be tried – whether damages an insufficient remedy – where balance of convenience lies – application dismissed.

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs – Application for costs where the applicant was successful in the substantive proceeding – Where the criteria for costs ordered on an indemnity basis was not satisfied – Costs ordered in accordance with the Court’s scale

INDUSTRIAL LAW – FAIR WORK – on remittal from the Full Court of the Federal Court – lengthy procedural history – initial application filed in 2015 – Letter from company to prospective employees – Full Court found letter contained threats to take adverse action – whether the Letter was sent with an intention to prevent the exercise of workplace right – consideration of chief operating officer’s evidence both at the first trial and re-trial – witness found to be credible – finding that letter not sent for proscribed purpose – section 340 and 343 claims not made out

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – procedural issue – whether judgment can be delivered when court advised after judgment reserved the respondent was placed in administration – operation of section 440D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – liberty to apply

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – protection visa – review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where the Tribunal made adverse credibility findings – whether the Tribunal’s findings were legally unreasonable – application dismissed

MIGRATION – application for judicial review – medical treatment visa – review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal - whether the Tribunal acted unreasonably in relation to the request for an extension of time – whether the Tribunal’s decision was affected by apprehended bias – no jurisdictional error established - application dismissed.

MIGRATION – Extension of time application – Short delay and satisfactory explanation – no prospects of success – application dismissed

MIGRATION – Whether the Tribunal conducted a proper review – whether the decision of the Tribunal was attended with any irrationality or illogicality – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – Whether the Tribunal carried out a proper review – whether the Tribunal misdirected itself as to its consideration of the relevant criteria under PIC 4020 – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – urgent interlocutory application to restrain Minister from removing applicant from Australia – whether serious question to be tried – whether damages an insufficient remedy – where balance of convenience lies – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – protection visa – whether a claim arose on the materials that the Tribunal did not consider – whether the Tribunal failed to afford the applicant procedural fairness.

BANKRUPTCY - review of Registrar’s decision to make a sequestration order – hearing de novo – validity of bankruptcy notice – section 41(5) applies – whether applicant debtor is insolvent – application dismissed

MIGRATION – Safe Have Enterprise visa – application for judicial review of decision of the then Immigration Assessment Authority – where the Authority constructively failed to exercise its jurisdiction to determine if the Applicants met the criteria as members of the same family unit of a non-citizen who met the criterion at s.36(2)(a) and/or (aa) – application allowed with costs

FAIR WORK - Whether employee or independent contractor – accessorial liability – unchallenged evidence of applicant –entitlements pursuant to modern award

MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision made by the Immigration Assessment Authority – where the Authority failed to consider new information against the requirements of s 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether that failure was material – whether the Authority asked itself the wrong question in deciding not to exercise its discretion in s 473DC of the Migration Act to get new information from the applicant at an interview – whether the Authority unreasonably failed to exercise, or considering exercising, its discretion in s 473DC of the Migration Act to get new information from the applicant – whether the Authority made a finding that was illogical or irrational – jurisdictional error established – writs issued.

INDUSTRIAL LAW – Practice and Procedure – determination of notices of objection to categories of documents called by subpoenas the applicant caused to be issued

MIGRATION – protection visa – application for extension of time to review decision of AAT–whether proper explanation of delay - consideration of the interest of the administration of justice –decision-maker’s duty to make inquiries – procedural fairness – application for extension of time dismissed

MIGRATION – application for review of decision made by registrar – where registrar summarily dismissed application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – de novo hearing – whether applicant has reasonable prospects of success on the substantive application – extension of time refused – costs ordered 

INDUSTRIAL LAW – where employee of deregistered company alleges that sole director of the company was involved in the company’s failure to make payments in accordance with an award – whether award covered the employee’s employment – whether company failed to make payments it was required to make under the award – whether sole director of the company was a person involved in company’s failure to pay amounts it was required to pay under the award – employee establishes that he was covered by the award and the company had failed to make payments to the employee it was required to make under the award but employee fails to establish that the sole director was involved in the company’s failure to comply with the award – application dismissed.

MIGRATION – Application for extension of time to bring application for review – where the substantive application for review was without merit and futile – where application for extension of time dismissed accordingly. 

MIGRATION – Immigration Assessment Authority – protection visa – whether there was a fraud on the Authority by the applicant’s agent – whether the agent inaccurately advised the applicant that he could not submit new information to the Authority – whether it was unreasonable for the Authority to not seek further submissions from the applicant when it was apparent that the submissions that had been lodged contained information unrelated to the applicant

MIGRATION – Student visa – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – judicial review – refusal of Student (Temporary) (Class TU) (Subclass 500) visa –whether the Tribunal denied procedural fairness to the applicant – inappropriate to infer proceedings brought for ulterior purpose – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed

INDUSTRIAL LAW – breaches of civil remedy provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – declarations of breach – imposition of pecuniary penalties – relevant considerations. INDUSTRIAL LAW – Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) - Compliance notice – contravention – whether compensation for contravention available.

INDUSTRIAL LAW - Where respondent underpaid his employee – where applicant served a Compliance Notice upon the respondent – where the respondent co-operated with the applicant during the course of the proceeding and remedied all underpayments – where a Statement of Agreed Facts was filed – declaration made accordingly.

MIGRATION – Protection visa – Application for extension of time to commence judicial review application – Where there is a delay of 16 months – Where no satisfactory explanation for the delay – Where the “real chance” test under the refugee criterion and the “real risk” test under the complementary protection criterion import the same test – Where the Tribunal found that there was not a “real chance” or a “real risk” because the  chance or risk of harm was remote or insubstantial if the Applicant returned to the receiving country – Where the proposed grounds of judicial review are not reasonably arguable – Application for extension of time dismissed

MIGRATION – Protection visa – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the Department failed to invite the applicant to attend an interview – whether the Tribunal failed to provide the applicant with an opportunity to provide information – whether the Tribunal failed to comply with the guidelines set out in The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees’ “Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status” – whether the Tribunal failed to consider relevant information – whether the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by inviting the applicant to attend a hearing – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed.  

MIGRATION – Student visa – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – application for an extension of time – lengthy delay – no prejudice – inadequate explanation provided – no arguable case of jurisdictional error – extension of time refused.

MIGRATION – Medical Treatment visa – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – matter listed for a final hearing – no appearance by or on behalf of the applicant – application dismissed for non-appearance pursuant to rule 13.06(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

MIGRATION – Injunction to prevent removal – relevant considerations.

INDUSTRIAL LAW – Practice and procedure – application by respondent for an order staying hearing submissions on damages, compensation, and penalties pending determination of application for leave to appeal against declarations that by purporting to summarily dismiss the applicant the respondent repudiated the applicant’s employment contract and contravened s 340(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – whether proposed notice of grounds of appeal reveal reasonable prospects of success – whether balance of convenience favours the granting or refusal of a stay – application for a stay refused.